This
isn’t about me. My mother-in-law was always quick to remind me of this in the sharp
tone she used to mask her fear that I would pull my support, pack my
“overnight” bag and leave her to die alone.
She
is Marybeth Schroeder, the red-haired lady who dressed for the TV camera and
took the Mayor and his council to task whenever she saw the need. For some she
was the voice of conscience, for others the proverbial thorn.
For
the last year that she lived alone, I was her caretaker, the significant other
who signed her outpatient release and unlocked her front door when she returned
home from rehab with a knitting hip and a nagging fear that the world had
changed in her absence. (Now she’s living in a lovely assisted living home,
grateful for her cheerful caretakers and the five frail women who share her
life.)
We
didn’t start off the best of friends. Forty-one years ago she bought a black
dress for her son’s wedding and refused to invite anyone from her side of the
family. Frankly, she wanted better for him and she was not shy about letting me
know.
I
was the in-law who never seemed to please, but who hung in there trying. Some
of the fault was mine. I didn’t share her vision of matriarchy with me on the
bottom rung. I was unfinished when I married her only child and I acquiesced
until her grudging intolerance became a pattern for us both.
A
Portuguese daughter of Azorean dairy farmers, she had worked hard to raise her
social status and she saw me as a spoiler. In the 50s she opened Schroeder’s
Photography, on Higuera Street, in San Luis Obispo, CA , and operated it for two
decades in three-inch heels and picture-perfect makeup. In the 60s she bought a
prime piece of real estate on Wilding Lane and designed her Tudor-style
house. Her castle.
Over
the years the two of us formed a history. Jaunts to old inns and cafes helped
diffuse our differences. She taught me nuances of style on shopping trips to Monterey , Fresno and Santa Barbara . I drove her to San Bernardino and back the same day, a
600-mile round trip so she could buy a Pekinese puppy to replace her beloved
Booper. On the way we dropped $60 on brunch at the Sheraton and giggled while a
white-jacketed waiter kept our champagne flutes filled.
When a heart attack forced her to give up
photography she became interested in city politics. At 85, she still drove
herself to City Hall three days a week and attended meetings that lasted until 1:00
A.M.
But the years caught up with her. One morning she missed the last two steps of
her stairway, tumbled and broke her femur. Two months later she was released
from rehab with a walker, a commode—and me.
The
days formed a comforting pattern. I made out her checks and she signed them.
She scrutinized the grocery receipts, questioned the calls I received on her
phone and tried to make things the way they had been. In the mornings I read to
her from my novel-in-progress. I slowed my pace to match hers. We took
afternoon tea with pound cake made of lemons from her backyard tree.
We
acted in single accord, respectful of our limits, but it was not easy. Visiting
nurses and physical therapists patted my arm and wrote covert notes encouraging
me. They understood that my mother-in-law was difficult.
At
the hospital I heard one of the nurses whisper, “She’s the daughter-in-law, not
the daughter!” The first time it happened, I smiled. But I realized that her
son needed to be at her side; he’d missed the best parts of his mother: the adventures,
her joie de vivre. He didn’t understand the glue that cemented his mother and
his wife like a feminine Odd Couple; two women who never liked each other very
much until we came to recognize the depth of our love.
One
night, when I washed her feet and painted her toenails with vermilion polish, I
looked up to find tears. She would never think to thank me, but I saw in her
eyes that she was touched. We are not
that different, I thought; when I am
old and alone I hope someone touches me like this.